Head-to-Head Comparison Table

ParameterRAD-140 (Testolone)LGD-4033 (Ligandrol)
DeveloperRadius HealthLigand / Viking Therapeutics
AR binding (Ki)~7 nM~1 nM (higher affinity)
Anabolic:Androgenic ratio~89:1~500:1 (more selective)
AromatizationNoneNone
5α-reductionNoneNone
Max clinical stagePhase I (oncology)Phase II (muscle, hip fracture)
Human lean mass dataNo Phase II lean mass data+1.21 kg at 1 mg/day/21 days
Neuroprotection dataYes (3+ published papers)Minimal
Half-life (rodent)~16–18h~24–36h
WADA statusS1 ProhibitedS1 Prohibited

When to Choose RAD-140

  • Neuroprotection research: RAD-140 has the most published neuroprotection data of any SARM — Aβ toxicity protection, HER2+ cancer neuroprotection, spatial memory in aged rats
  • AR selectivity profiling: Its ~89:1 A:A ratio makes it useful in comparative selectivity studies
  • ER+ breast cancer biology: Phase I conducted in ER+/HER2+ breast cancer — relevant research context
  • Shorter half-life protocols: ~16–18h vs 24–36h for LGD-4033; useful for more frequent dosing interval designs

When to Choose LGD-4033

  • Muscle wasting models: Basaria Phase II data provides human PK and efficacy benchmarks at 1 mg/day; highest lean mass effect per dose of any SARM in human data
  • Hip fracture/rehabilitation models: Viking Phase II data directly relevant to musculoskeletal rehabilitation research
  • Once-daily chronic protocols: Longer half-life (~24–36h) is better suited to once-daily steady-state dosing
  • Prostate safety models: Higher A:A ratio (~500:1) means more prostate-sparing in comparative androgenic side effect studies

Combination Research Designs

Some research designs may combine RAD-140 and LGD-4033 to probe complementary aspects of AR biology — e.g., neuroprotection (RAD-140) in a model that also requires lean mass readouts (LGD-4033 benchmarks). Mechanistically, both bind the same receptor; combined use in single models should account for competitive binding at AR.